data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cb8d/6cb8d0e31afa828508f48b9f3b37a47e460b4fa0" alt=""
me about him leading the ticket is the fact the GOP smear machine will make the word 'Socialist' his first name in every social medium possible.
Having said all that I did watch most of the debate because I had decided I wanted to watch the dynamic between them to see if they were going to cut into each other beyond what is necessary to gain enough support for a victory in the coming New York primary this Tuesday, April 19th. Right away I felt uncomfortable with their demeanor as they addressed one another. After all I can just as easily vote for Bernie in the general election as I can Hillary no matter who wins. I didn't like the tone both were taking with each other though I understand this is a political bare knuckle fight for the bounty of 240+ delegates at stake. My point of this discussion is something that continues to bother me about Sanders and how Its really starting to turn me off about him.
Since the beginning of the campaign he has been going after Hillary steadily over her Wall Street connections and the money her campaign is receiving from the various firms that inhabit the financial capital of the country. Then there is the continued call to release the transcripts of her paid presentations to a variety of various wall street firms. The thing is I have no problem with her connections to the sinews of power that make up the core of the United States financial market matrix. She should never apologize for that as it gives her power and gravitas to work from within Wall Street and the financial community when she's in a position to initiate reforms which brings us to the crux of this discussion.
The list of Hillary's top donors seem to be missing one conspicuous organization in particular: the NRA. The thing is Sanders can't keep harping about who she gets or receives money from for her campaign when it can be proved she hasn't made a decision that favors them in a specific instance with a quid pro quo for contributions. As for the NRA and her 'F' rating Sanders can't have it both ways attacking her for her connections with various Wall Street lobbying firms and their PAC money while she attacks the NRA lobby and the money from their PAC's rejecting a possible money stream to her campaign. If she is so craven and crass to take money from any source this argument makes no sense.
I would feel better if Bernie and Hillary both would confine their argument on the nuance of policy differences as opposed to attacking one another on moral grounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment